I do want to say however that there is starting to be a lot of chatter about COVID damaging your immune system. It would be in everyones best interest to get this as few times as possible.
The PERSISTANT rumor is that this virus was made from SARS and AIDS. When the rumor came out in March 2020 or so, I was very skeptical and didn't quite understand it. But AIDS also destroys your immune system. It seems COVID does the same.
Now... you can believe me or not. But don't say someone didn't warn you, because our government is MIA or trying to kill us. I'm not sure which.
Also - cases have been rising for 16 days in a row. But barely any States are counting anymore, so your risk factor is completely unknown. I just find it hilarious. But people love this incompetence.
SARS-CoV-1 != SARS. (Mistah S will love the notation here. :-) )
ReplyDeleteHIV-1 != AIDS, HIV-2 = AIDS, etc.
That's because the "Syndrome" (the final S) is an umbrella for one or more things that can lead to having the syndrome.
So this is about certain glycoproteins of HIV-1 and of SARS-CoV-1 having something in common with SARS-CoV-2 (a.k.a. COVID-19) ... and this is actually the case.
"I was very skeptical and didn't quite understand it ..."
You're still not getting it, so back to HIV-1 gene therapy immunity versus natural immunity to COVID-19, just for the fun of it.
HIV-1 gene therapy immunity came about because of inducing the delta-32 variant of the CCR5 gene and having it take up residence in bone marrow where it would eventually drive out the HIV-1 infection, producing lasting elimination of it.
COVID-19 gene therapy immunity exists already for anyone with the p46 allele of the OAS1 gene, and a working gene therapy could be built around that.
In both cases, the gene therapy winds up being very expensive, and it's unlikely that any national health safety organization would approve it.
But the CCR5 delta-32 gene therapy exists as a black market therapy already.
Where? How? What?
You don't ask your local pot dealer these kinds of questions, do you.
HAHAHAHAHAHA OF COURSE YOU DON'T. :-)
Now back to the whole "is it AIDS or is it HIV-1" thing: an Acquired Immune Deficiency for which AIDS is the umbrella term can be the result of HIV-1 or any other thing that creates similar conditions.
HIV-1 isn't the only thing that can create the conditions for AIDS as a medical condition.
About a few specifics then ...
The PRRA segment is new and unique to COVID-19, plus the extreme rarity of it points toward this being a manufactured pathogen rather than one that naturally occurs.
The interesting data points of certain glycoproteins also being present in COVID-19 also leads toward that determination, especially since HIV-1 was used as a test substrate for several types of gene therapies and research toward them.
Interesting similarities between parts of gp41 and gp120 showed up early, and a lot of this information was suppressed. (Remember the Indian paper early on that was squashed like a bug?)
Other interesting similarities showed up with parts of tat and pol which would imply either an active or latent ability to perform reverse transcription (RT). Certain pieces of research imply strongly that even a heavily damaged pol sequence can be reconstructed in vivo and produce a working reverse transcription component.
ReplyDeleteAnd now we're hearing stuff about HIV1 RT and LINE1 RT, especially the latter, along with an increase of hepatitis.
But this is coming along with an induced immune failure that has appeared with the so-called "COVID-19 vaccine" (a.k.a., The Vaxx), with its mystery adjuvants and all.
So at what point do you stop worrying about airborne COVID-19 and start worrying about iatrogenically transmitted COVID-19 in the form of The Vaxx?
With that in mind, let's get back to this.
"... didn't quite understand it ..."
And you're not going to.
That's because even the best genetics researchers do not fully understand how reverse transcription works, how to break RT genes so they don't work, and how to fight such things as HIV-1 and COVID-19 at the transcription level so that the disease spread don't even progress to the RT phase.
But they have managed to slow down HIV-1 RT with such things as PrEP.
While I could perhaps explain this with a discourse on the current weaknesses and strengths of retroviral treatments available today, understand that these don't actually cure the problems, any of them.
They're only good at slowing things down until HIV-1 transforms itself so that its RT machinery totally ignores PrEP, at which point HIV-1 infection kicks into gear and becomes untreatable again. It's this slow moving "key attack" that researchers also don't understand yet, although the upcoming generation of pathogen-specific RT blockers shows they're figuring it out slowly via an iterative process. (Also known as "throw science against a wall and see what sticks", in the mode of Aperture Science.)
What's really going on then?
If you're a big pharma manager, which would you prefer in terms of your profits, to have PrEP for COVID-19, which lets you slow it down (and also play favorites in terms of who can afford to get the treatment), or an actual proper cure?
Maybe this isn't as sinister as it seems: you need the funding from the slow down treatment to fund the eventual cure, and so the early diseased with resources get to fund the cure of those unfortunate enough to get it later.
When the thing is mostly avoidable (as was the case with HIV-1), you can grow a thick skin against feeling too bad about the early diseased, especially if they were ignorant or foolish enough to keep spreading it.
Fortunes of companies big enough that they were once household names in the US were dissipated into keeping the supply of HIV-1 therapies for their children and grandchildren flowing so these people could live a little longer on the family fortunes.
But it doesn't help when governments try to give a disease "human rights" flavors.
As for your government trying to kill you ... do you want a list?
More to the point: do you think that the "sudden" and "miraculous" appearance of PreP For COVID-19 (ITS COMING) wasn't already planned for?
The well-connected can go get the parallel black market gene therapy instead.
Honestly.... when I saw how long this post was I settled in for it to be crazy. But it was actually quite reasonable.
ReplyDeleteThe thing is - both the vax and exposure are doing somewhat the same thing. I mean... people should ask themselves - what other virus mutates like this, and why do you think your immune system is equipped to handle repeated reving. It is completely unknown what happens when your immune system gets juiced like this repeatedly.
There is starting to be more evidence that immune systems aren't made for that.
"... when I saw how long this post was I settled in for it to be crazy ..."
ReplyDeleteOH LOOK AT YOU. :-)
"... both the vax and exposure are doing somewhat the same thing ..."
Not entirely, but there's an overlap, and there are parts that are not the same.
The part that doesn't overlap involves various adjuvants.
One of the original theories of mRNA vaccine uptake was that you'd have to suppress the immune system slightly in order for the mRNA components to be taken up across the body.
Later this turned into creating a synthetic component that while like a naturally occurring component, it would prevent the mRNA from being deconstructed by the immune system, essentially operating like an immune system bypass.
What was not clear, in part because there weren't enough studies done to confirm whether this worked 100% of the time without additional consequences, was whether the synthetic component was itself a confounding agent when it comes to immune suppression.
As for the parts that are not the same?
"It is completely unknown what happens when your immune system gets juiced like this repeatedly."
In a manner similar to what's going on now, perhaps yes, but actually no when it comes to knowledge about the subject at all.
B cells and various types of T cells try to map attacks from pathogens, including viruses, to a template that allows them to respond more quickly to repeated attacks.
The problem is that there's a species-specific timer involved, and that timer's reset may be much farther out than the pathogen may evolve naturally or artificially.
This is part of the reason why uptake of HIV-1 in CD4+ T cells is so problematic, that the timer's reset doesn't come before cytokine activation that could lead to cytokine storms.
The best studied cells for this are CD4+ and CD8+ T cells.
Hazard a gue$$ as to why that's the case.
Also, boosting T cell responses is not necessarily a good thing, and the syndrome you've noticed is what could be called Sustained Immune Fatigue Syndrome.
Enough CD4+ cells get activated that they choose to sit out the fight.
Enough CD8+ cells get activated that they committed suicide and aren't around for the fight.
And B cell imprinting on pathogens works on a very slow timer, which means that rapidly adjusting pathogens or highly aggressive vaccine campaigns will leave them out of the fight.
So what's happening is something that's been known could occur, it's just that it's never been observed on a scale anywhere close to what is starting to happen now.
"There is starting to be more evidence that immune systems aren't made for that."
The evidence was already available.
You have to choose to follow the evidence.
Barring that, you get stuck within a "philosophical relativism" of the type that keeps you trapped within a self-reinforcing framework of lies, half-truths, and full-blown bullshit.
"Our country excels [at] shifting personal responsiblity. So, you guys go on with your bad selves."
You sure about that?
I think if you knew, you wouldn't be so sure about that.
But you are at least learning! :-)
"You have to choose to follow the evidence."
ReplyDeleteLOL. I already know the answer. As much as anything can be known at this point. It's just a lot for your average person to digest. You have to wait for people to adjust to the new equation. I mean.. even you have come a long way.
Nicely done though.
"I mean ... even you have come a long way."
ReplyDeleteNot really, I just hit my Maximum Bullshit Level and have been proceeding from there.
What it comes down to is ages old: Aristotle once wrote of people who cannot digest discourse and who require rhetoric, especially of the emotive variety.
Aristotle wasn't in a position to notice what Nietzsche knew, which is that most people have constructions of themselves as "good people" to which everything else that goes against that happens to come from "bad people", including streams of thought.
Once you get past the idea that you have to be "good people" without question, that makes doing the things that are actually good a lot more straightforward because you're not coaxed into "checking in" with everyone else for whatever warped idea of consensus reality they hold on to.
But in doing this, you absolutely have to choose to consider the evidence.
There are people who will not consider the evidence no matter how much you happen to have because it goes against what Edward Bernays in his infamous book on Propaganda (with a capital P) called "logic-proof compartments".
I don't worry too much about people who have these "logic-proof compartments" because everyone has them, but I do bother with the ones who pretend to make efforts to overcome them but actually do this as a kind of intellectual cover.
So with that in mind, and as an example of change, I'll explain something going on right now that looks like we're being ripped off, but we're not.
Although new production of certain components uses a simplified layout with everything integrated as a result of having more trustworthy suppliers, we are still in a position to benefit from less trustworthy suppliers.
Several component boards are commodity boards, meaning that they can be used as-is with some light modifications, and several components on others are reusable.
For instance, one manufacturer got wise to this and started putting BGA chips on carrier PCBs that could themselves be wave soldered into place, while another went full-on sockets and abandoned BGAs.
And so what's in your news right now is how some American auto manufacturer (and yes, we know which one) is salvaging components out of "washing machines" (which the news says, and reality doesn't bear it out).
Well, what did you think we were buying back in 2020 before the big move?
Consumer retail products with commodity boards in them that we could re-manufacture.
ReplyDeleteAvailable at Walmart.
We'd strip all of the packaging in the parking lot, have a hauler show up to pick up the recyclables, and sell a few boxes of repair parts to whoever we could find locally who would buy the parts ... even if we made no money on any of that.
The goal was to have hundreds to thousands of the critical PCBs and assemblies we needed to keep our products rolling out.
Now that an American auto manufacturer is doing the same thing, but we were doing it in 2020, and we're still doing it.
Wait ... What? Why?
Because while bullshitting among ourselves on a call one day, one of the engineers had a laugh at the company's expense that was worth millions.
"What if we just let the Chinese rip us off so we'd have parts and charge the users of the ripped off parts a license fee?"
That was an absolutely brilliant idea.
We do this now, and because of it, we no longer have a supply chain problem.
For our needs, the parts now get delivered to us via third-parties and we never have to talk to the suppliers.
Anything unsuitable gets sent back to the third parties and they deal with beating down the suppliers to get production that's within specs.
We never touch everything else, and after verifying the customer's invoices, we take the license fee money and run with it. Sometimes they deliver, and sometimes we pick up if we're in a hurry, hence sitting on the tarmac at Changi a few times.
Now we have Slack (aaaaaaa, praise BoB!) that lets us try out new things instead of having everything under a narrow range of product lines.
Also, we can afford to import stuff our people want and need as a benefit to them, and so with new income streams, morale despite the lockdowns and other bullshit is at an all-time high.
All because this increasingly aged fucker got out of the way of the inevitable change from a product manufacturing basis to a commodity licensing basis.
But my time as an advisor is soon to come to an end, and perhaps with that will be the end of my "permis B", although I think they're OK with me remaining as an employee who self-funds his employment.
The irony then is that I'm soon going to be licensing myself.
It's looking like a good time to invest in Serbia, or at least to have a backup location in case the world's insanity comes to Switzerland and does more than cause it to choose to abandon centuries of mostly durable neutrality.
ReplyDeleteBTW, the new arrangements also mean that Russian companies can continue to do business as usual, importing directly from the PRC and paying license fees on the components to an account at Gazprombank.
Do you have an account at Gazprombank yet? :-)
They have credit cards that work on the JCB network which many shops in the US will take, and if that's a huge problem, you can get one of the SE Asia banks to issue a JCB card if you take it as a deposit-backed debit card.
Cash back rates are insanely good on the Gazprombank cards, we're talking 5% to 8% as standard.
Plus if you're a business account holder ... oh, wait, you still have this Angry Buzzard on a Blue Passport problem, don't you. :-)
BTW the comment plug-in isn't quite the same -- minor HTML editing problems don't get flagged, so that one inline link turned into several paragraphs.
ReplyDeleteNot that you weren't going to notice it anyway. :-)
Oh - we are still doing this cloth mask shit. How 2020.
ReplyDeleteI'm at the age now that I don't have to divide people into good and bad. I only need to recognize those who are self destructive and avoid those boulders. You see... people are perfectly willing to spiral out on their own. You just have to have the patience to wait it out.
I've been telling my inner circle since 2020 that this "virus" is vascular. Your body's immune system freaks out and starts making clots.
Over the months it's becoming more evident that the virus is systemic. It can affect everything in your body.
And I have been more than slightly wondering if those of us who were most demonized will be the only ones left with a functioning immune system because somehow people think getting infected with this several times a year has no consequences.
So yeah... considering the evidence indeed. But it's your life. You choose it. I just wait to see how self destructive.